The Princess of Wales allegedly took decisive action to distance her husband, Prince William, from Rose Hanbury following widespread speculation about an affair. New claims from royal insiders suggest Kate Middleton demanded William cut ties with Hanbury, reportedly leading to her systematic removal from their social circle.
The Alleged Fallout and Royal Intervention
According to royal biographer Andrew Lownie – who briefly published details on his Substack before deleting the post – Kate was “devastated” by the 2019 rumors linking William and Hanbury. The insider claimed Kate directly instructed William to avoid Hanbury entirely, and that the couple underwent counseling to navigate the fallout. Despite marital tensions, the source indicated a divorce remains unlikely.
This intervention followed a period when Kate and Hanbury, once close friends, were conspicuously absent from each other’s company. The sudden shift fueled speculation of a falling out, with rumors quickly escalating into allegations of an affair.
The Origins of the Controversy
The story gained traction after The Sun published a 2019 report suggesting a rift between the two women. This sparked further discussion when writers Giles Coren and Nicole Cliffe both publicly referenced the alleged affair, though Coren swiftly deleted his tweet and issued an apology.
Notably, there has been no concrete evidence to substantiate the affair claims beyond these now-deleted posts and unsubstantiated hearsay. Despite the lack of proof, the rumors persisted, fueled by the perceived disappearance of Hanbury from Kate and William’s inner circle.
Current Status and Lingering Questions
Recent reports suggest Kate and Hanbury may have reconnected following King Charles III’s coronation. However, all parties involved have remained publicly silent on the matter.
The key takeaway is that while the rumors remain unverified, the alleged response from Kate Middleton highlights a willingness to aggressively manage public perception and protect the royal image. The incident raises questions about the extent to which palace insiders are willing to control narratives, even by silencing those who speak out.
The absence of definitive proof ensures the scandal will continue to resurface, especially as long as key figures refuse to address it directly.
